The jury for P Diddy’s trial watched videos of the alleged ‘freak offs’ that the mogul embarked upon with various ex-girlfriends.

While much of the trial has consisted of testimonies – some from Diddy’s ex-girlfriends such as Cassie Ventura and two testifying under pseudonyms, Doe and Mia – day 24 of the trial saw the jury take a break and instead watch videos provided by the prosecutors of these alleged ‘freak offs’.

Ventura confirmed during her testimony that the word ‘freak-offs’ was code for multi-day sex sessions often involving male sex workers and lasting multiple days.

Diddy is facing five counts of sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution and racketeering conspiracy – he denies all charges against him. Prosecuting lawyers have also accused him of abusing, threatening and coercing his victims into ‘fulfilling his sexual desires’ between 2004 and 2024. He has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing.

A prosecutor questioned a special agent from the Department of Justice, asking him to list the alleged hotels where Diddy held his ‘freak offs’ with Ventura and some male escorts.

The prosecutor then played 30 seconds of three 11-12 minute videos of various freak-offs. The jurors were given headphones to listen to the audio, and they were so quiet while watching it was possible to hear the moaning and other sexual noises escaping from the headphones. No one in the gallery or the other lawyers were given headphones to access the videos, but could only hear the second hand audio in the quiet courtroom. 

TMZ has reported that one older, female juror looked ‘visibly disturbed’ and what she saw and shook her head while watching, while a male juror stared at the footage with his chin in his hand. A younger juror reportedly giggled at the first image that appeared on screen.

Diddy and Doe also referred to ‘freak-offs’ as Hotel Nights (other names included Debauchery and Wild King Nights), which were drug-fueled sex sessions that lasted for days in some cases. Doe testified that they could last for up to three and a half days, and took place in Los Angeles, New York, Miami and Turks and Caicos. She described how bed sheets and towels covered the hotel room furniture for ‘excessive use of baby oil everywhere’.

Diddy’s indictment says that federal agents allegedly seized ‘more than 1000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant’ when they raided Diddy’s homes in Los Angeles and Miami. 

Hotel records were found to support these claims, as one hotel in Beverly Hills hotel wrote on Diddy’s guest profile that he ‘always spills candle wax on everything and uses excessive amounts of oil, place the room out of order upon departure for deep cleaning’.

Ventura has previously testified that she and Diddy would use 10 bottles of baby oil for each ‘freak off’ while Doe testified that two dozen bottles were used per ‘hotel night’.

Doe also testified that herself and Diddy had a ‘love contract’, which was a verbal agreement which saw them take a two-year break from ‘hotel nights’. This saw Doe receive $10,000 a month, which was used to pay her rent. She testified that she felt ‘obligated’ to perform in ‘hotel nights’ out of ‘fear of losing the roof over my head’.

She also described ‘movie nights’ with Diddy that consisted of herself and Diddy watching porn or tapes of their previous sex sessions, as well as discussing their fantasy. Doe testified that she bought him a mobile TV for his birthday so they could watch footage on it during their ‘movie nights’.

Doe also described a ‘sobriety party’ that she threw for Diddy at his request, after she expressed concern over his drug use back in October 2023. He agreed to be sober for 30 days but soon requested a ‘sobriety party’, which ended up being a ‘hotel night’ in a Beverly Hills Hotel.

She recalled being sober at the event, slept with two escorts and ran to the bathroom afterwards as she felt sick. Diddy encouraged her to sleep with a third man, even though she didn’t feel well. Doe testified ‘I was disgusted. I was repulsed.’

A juror has also been dismissed from the trial due to concerns he had given ‘inconsistent’ details about where he lives. During the initial jury selection, he completed a questionnaire that confirmed he lived in the Bronx area of New York. But confusion was caused more recently, when he told a court staffer that he had moved in with his girlfriend in New Jersey.

The judge presiding over the trial, Arun Subramanian, said he had found ‘several inconsistencies’ between the juror’s answers in court transcripts. He added that this could suggest a desire to ‘be deceptive’ in an effort to get on the jury.

Diddy’s lawyers have opposed the decision to remove the juror in question, saying that Diddy would be ‘substantially prejudiced by the dismissal’ of a black male from the jury. The juror has been replaced by a 57-year-old white man.

This implication has been rejected, with prosectors denying that they were making decisions based on race, insisting that it was a ‘wonderful thing’ that the jury was diverse.

The judge added that the jury for Diddy’s trial does not raise concerns when it comes to diversity: ‘The court cannot and should not let race factor into what it should do.’

Diddy’s trial is expected to last until early July. He denies all charges against him.